Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.
Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA
The Mockingbird Foundation is a non-profit organization founded by Phish fans in 1996 to generate charitable proceeds from the Phish community.
And since we're entirely volunteer – with no office, salaries, or paid staff – administrative costs are less than 2% of revenues! So far, we've distributed over $2 million to support music education for children – hundreds of grants in all 50 states, with more on the way.
Second, have you all considered instead of a 1-5 or 1-10 scale where reviewers have to choose a whole number, offering a scale (and choices for reviewers to select) that allows for more nuance within that most commonly hit zone of 3-5? Most simple might be offering these choices: 1, 2, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5. Lots of different ways you could go at it, but something along these lines would allow careful reviewers a chance to give more measured/nuanced input which may end up with more aggregate ratings more aligned with actual sentiment. Just a thought!